Voting on this proposal is now closed. See the CJ page for results.
Please register your vote and any comments below regading Jake's proposal about the FR/CJ/SCB liason role(s).
The Proposal
1. That the CJ and SCB liason be temporarily merged into one person's
role which I will take on.
2. This liason will take care of all official communications from FR
with CJ and SCB through Mike Gable until the lease and building
improvements are fully negotiated, at which time we will revisit the
idea of separate liasons for each entity on the property vs. keeping
one FR liason who works with everyone.
3. We will make Mike aware that we are not giving up any right to
contact Nathaniel or SCB directly if we see fit to do so but we WILL
use him as the conduit for OFFICIAL communications between FR and SCB
until the lease and building improvements are finalized.
If you feel your comments are too sensitive for this highly public forum, please use Free Ride's email list to register them.
Suggested deadline for votes and comments is Midnight on Sunday, March 2. Please comment if this seems unreasonable.
| NAME |
VOTE |
COMMENTS |
| jake |
yes |
|
| will |
yes |
|
| shaun |
yes |
|
| stuart |
yes |
Point 3 makes me a little nervous, I might just say 'all official communications will go through CJ' and not address unofficial communications explicitly. |
| andalusia |
yes |
|
| jessica |
yes to 1 & 2 |
point three makes me nervous too. Jake, perhaps you could explain a bit why it seems important to you? Two reasons I'm uncomfortable: 1) I don't see it as in our interest to negociate directly with Nathaniel. Honestly I think it's better that Mike is the conduit for communications between us and Nathaniel, it's more likely to keep things running well. 2) I'm unclear on the bounds of "official business." Does this mean we can't talk to Nathaniel if we see him? Does it mean we can talk to him about the weather but not about anything to do with CJ? Does it mean we can talk to him about when the bikes are getting moved but not how the entrance is getting funded? |
| Scott |
yes |
|
| jami |
yes |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.